asakiyume: (Iowa Girl)
I am loving Saint Death's Daughter, by C. S. E. Cooney, with a powerful love and a deep wonder. No description I encountered of the book before starting it comes anywhere near doing it justice, including the author's own, so I'm not going to try. Instead I'll tell you about its effect on me and some of the things it's done so far. (I'm a little more than a third of the way through the story.)

I was enjoying from the start its humor, both in language and in in-story encounters, and its tenderness and darkness, and how deftly and quickly I knew and loved the characters--there were some dramatic moments, some regrets for the main character, Lanie Stones, and some sweet successes--and THEN there was a tremendously dramatic moment, and I realized I was experiencing the story with the sort of bated breath and tenterhooks feeling that I haven't had since childhood. In that moment there were several swooping twists and turns that I totally didn't expect, and yet they were completely right and justified, if you know what I mean. They had been prepared for, but I hadn't noticed the gears and scaffolding of the preparation, not because I wasn't reading closely but because it had been in beautiful plain sight all along, and I'd been admiring it for other reasons. As if the painting on the wall of a woman with a sword is actually a woman with a sword--I didn't notice! But of course!

To be transported like that by a story, it's like flying.

But it's not plot magic for just for plot magic's sake, there's profound stuff going on too, about different understandings of love and everything it can shade into, and about regret/remorse/recompense, and about children and adults, but none of that stuff is blared out like an object lesson; it's not a burden the story's carrying-it's all just part of the weave.

Have some wonderful lines.

Here, a terrifying character observes her beloved:

Nita’s gaze tracked the gyration, a terrifying tenderness colonizing her face.

Here, a conversational gambit typical of children:

“Why not?” repeated her remorseless niece now. Datu was entirely capable of repeating those same two words for the rest of the night.

Here, curiosity described in a way that lingers:

“And what is it,” breathed the Blackbird Bride, her colorless eyes brilliant with calamitous curiosity, “that you ask?”

Here, a father (Mak) saying to his young daughter that choices have consequences:

“Mumyu is not here,” said Mak flatly. “Mumyu made her own choices, and her choices found her out. We are here. You and I and your aunt and the Elif Doéden. We are all here together in this place. We are in great danger. We must trust and respect each other. We must treat each other as allies.

Anyway--thoroughly enjoying it. And the sequel, Saint Death's Herald, comes out next month!
asakiyume: (Em reading)
I'm reading too many things to do them all justice, and then interrupting them with other things, but the things I've spent most time with are

--More of Life Is Not Useful, by Ailton Krenak. The first essay was good; I felt more at sea in the second and now the third--I can't quite follow the logic of where he goes all the time, and sometimes there are jargonish phrases that I don't get. Even so, there are moments I like very much.

This, for instance, is both serious but also amusingly expressed:
We can inhabit this planet, but we will have to do so otherwise. If we don’t take steps in this direction, it would be as if someone wanted to get to the highest peak of the Himalayas but wanted to take along their house, their fridge, their dog, their parrot, their bicycle. They’ll never arrive with heavy luggage like that. We will have to radically reconceive of ourselves to be here. And we yearn for this newness.

And this I love:
There are people who were fish, there are people who were trees before imagining themselves as human. We were all something else before becoming people.

--I also have been reading Eagle Drums, by Nasuġraq Rainey Hopson, a story of an Iñupiaq boy who's compelled to live with eagles to learn what they want to teach if he wants to stay alive. I got this one from the library based on what [personal profile] osprey_archer wrote in this entry, specifically, that it "is built on axioms about how the world works that are vastly different than the ones structuring most modern fiction." She's right! And I'm enjoying that very much.

--I started reading C.S.E. Cooney's Saint Death's Daughter-- I love CSE Cooney's writing so much! I just hope I can maintain momentum on it, because it's long, and somehow I don't apportion as much time to reading as I could (which is a terrible thing for someone who writes to confess to).

Meanwhile, here are some things that I want to read (or have read and want to call attention to):

Aster Glenn Gray's Deck the Halls with Secret Agents. Long-time rival Soviet and US agents meet at a Christmas party! I wonder what happens next ;-)

Iona Datt Sharma's Blood Sweat Glitter --Sapphic romance around roller derby!

This one came to me as a recommendation on Mastodon, and since I follow the author on social media but have never read anything by her, I'm very excited! It's also a podcast--not sure if I will listen or read it: "The Font of Liberty" by Elizabeth Porter Birdsall.

And then there's Kerygma in Waltz Time, which I've read and would recommend to fans of story retellings, fan fiction, and falling into stories--it's by Sherwood Smith, originally published under a pseudonym in It Happened at the Ball, an anthology of ballroom stories.
asakiyume: (shaft of light)
In The Mountain in the Sea, Ray Nayler made the fact that octopuses were able to write a central part of what indicates they're advanced (a character says, “Yes, they have writing… which is an enormous leap in cultural evolution”)--a hugely ethnocentric notion.

So it's very affirming to read Natalia Brizuela's introduction to another brief collection of essays by the Indigenous Brazilian activist Ailton Krenak. (The collection is called Life Is Not Useful.) She writes:
Yasnaya Aguilar, the Mixé linguist, writer, and activist, reminds us ... that Indigenous people do not have “oral traditions,” but rather “mnemonic traditions.”8 ... Western modernity, with its countless institutions and homogenizing temporal framework, always sees the oral as preceding the written, as falling somewhere behind in the chronology of development. But as Ailton and many other Indigenous people explain, the practice and activation of memories – through dreaming, singing, dancing, storytelling, and various other activities – are ways of belonging to and sustaining the cosmic sense of life.

8 See Yasnaya Aguilar Gil, “(Is There) an indigenous Literature?”, trans. Gloria Chacón, Diálogos 19.1 (Spring 2016), p. 158.

She goes on to quote Ailton about the importance of listening and then to unfold that:
“Either you hear the voices of all the other beings that inhabit the planet alongside you, or you wage war against life on earth” (p. 38) ... Listening means being alive, staying alive, and keeping the ecosystems to which one belongs alive as well. Listening is caring. Not listening brings war: that is, a type of destructive encounter, a form of non-co-existence. We listen with our entire bodies, not just our ears ... Our bodies are part of and an extension of the Earth. If we allow them to become sensing instruments for dreaming and conversation, the cosmic sense of life would not be so threatened.


I love this statement: We listen with our entire bodies, not just our ears.
asakiyume: (yaksa)
The characters are so alone in this book. There's no community and no model for/of community--at all! Just people groping toward (or away from) one another on an individual basis. Evrim, the sole android ever created, Ha, the solo octopus researcher at the research site, Rustem the solo hacker, Altantsetseg the solo security agent, Arnkatla Minervudóttir-Chan (LOL, Minerva's daughter), the solo designer of the android. Eiko, the enslaved guy on the fishing ship, strives not to be solo: he actively tries to see people and build unity with them, but his efforts are mainly fruitless.

I thought this was going to be contrasted with something not-solo about the octopuses, but no. There is no octopus perspective, and the way the octopuses are "read" by the humans (and Evrim) presses them into a human mold rather than seeing them on their own terms. For example, the autonomy of octopuses' legs from their executive function gets talked about, but it never figures at all. Instead, we see the legs used for walking on (on land, even!), like human legs, and for holding weapons or gifts, like human hands. Octopuses as like us rather than different from us.

In the sense that they're living creatures, that's true. Organic life is having a hard time in this future world, whether it's octopuses or humans or sea turtles. The octopuses can kill one or two intruders in their garden, just as Altantsetseg can kill intruders in the cordoned-off zone where research is going on, but in the end, the nonhuman systems that people have built but no longer control are more powerful and not given to compromise.

So what does the future hold? Evrim is seen as better than human because they're incapable of forgetting things. And yet even within the story, perfect recall is shown as problematic. Characters talk about trauma being etched in the body and the memory. So it seems strange to celebrate perfect recall as an improvement. A solo being, able to brood over each and every thing that's ever happened to them ... brrrr, seems cold, very cold.

Huh, well that turned out more negative than I thought it would when I began writing this entry. My Goodreads review was more positive. I guess I have lots of very mixed feelings about the book. It sure has been food for thought, though.
asakiyume: (miroku)
I'm nearly done with The Mountain in the Sea, by Ray Nayler, which I picked up hoping and expecting a cool nonhuman intelligence first-contact situation (with octopuses), and which has that, sort of, but is mainly about the nature of consciousness and the mind, human loneliness, and How Bad We Humans Are For This World Of Ours. To my amusement and chagrin, the plotline that pulled me in is the corporate scheming one--more so than the octopus researcher + lonely android, and definitely more than the slave fishing vessel. (Favorite characters so far: Rustem the hacker and Altantsetseg the security person.) But they've all been gripping enough to keep me reading and thinking.

I'll do a proper review later, but what I want to talk about here is the concept of "Point Fives" (.5). In the novel, a character remarks that many people don't really want to interact with a whole, complete other person (1.0)--too much friction! They want someone who's always interested in what they're doing--not just as a yes-man, but with genuine interest, asking appropriate questions, etc.--someone who has enough of a personality to have their own interesting quirks and unexpected conversational gambits, but who will never grandstand, never make emotional demands, will always take second place to the "full" person. (As I type this, it occurs to me that basically the character is saying that people want the stereotyped 1950s male ideal of a wife.) In the story, these exist! AI virtual companions. (Not physically, I don't think: just as like a hologram.)

Maybe needless to say, the narrative thrust of the story disapproves of this philosophically, while acknowledging its seductiveness. And I'm here to underline both parts of that! Both the disapproval, but also the seductiveness--speaking as someone who has essentially built up Point Fives in my head from time to time.

Example: When I was eight, friends of my parents came over from England, bringing two of their kids, one of whom, a girl, was my age. She read the same stories I did! Even the weird ones! I had a great time playing with her, and after she left, I decided she was my True Best Friend, my one and only. She wrote me letters in which she drew pictures of horses--and she could draw them so they looked real! I fantasized about her coming back to visit. I fantasized about her coming to school with me. I fantasized about drawing pictures together, going on adventures together, reading stories together, etc.

I did have some real input for these fantasies--she was really writing letters--but for the most part I was creating her to suit me. But it caused eventual disappointment because guess what! She was her own real person, with her own real interests, not ones scripted by me! I've done similar with other people. It always requires that the person be conveniently unavailable in some way: real, present people are not so amenable to this treatment. After years of experience, I now can recognize the danger signs of this behavior and (try to) nip it in the bud.

Meanwhile, I'm happy to say I've had real friendships, with people who are really present--not necessarily physically present in my house or neighborhood (though yes, in my house and neighborhood too)--but present in the sense that I'm interacting with them in multiple ways, and frequently, so we're seeing multiple aspects of each other. We have a sense of obligation or responsibility for one another--probably not an equal sense: for one thing, people are rarely exactly balanced in their degree of interest in or commitment to one another, but also, people need and want different amounts of commitment, and people have differing abilities to give. So it's not a balanced thing, and it's not without friction, stress, and disappointment. But it's also very rewarding, very beautiful, in moments.

In The Mountain in the Sea, one character reflects on not really seeing the people he's around. A traumatic thing has just happened, and it awakens in him a desire to have his eyes open from now on, to see and pay attention to the people (and one can extend this beyond just people, though probably we do own an extra something to our species siblings). It's the first step away from the solipsism represented by Point Fives.
asakiyume: (Em reading)
I finished Rebecca Fraimow's Lady Eve's Last Con, which was rollicking good fun from cover to cover. A couple more quotes (nonspoilery) from further on in the story:

"I’d given her plenty of time to put me back in my place; she’d be faster on the draw next time around. It’s a bad habit to let yourself get caught tongue-tied. Life’s too short for should-have-saids." (51% in)

"I stuck my chin up, and tried to look like a person who was trying to look brave." (91% in)

I got one hilarious surprise, which was that one firm prediction I'd had since the very beginning ... didn't come true. All along I'd been congratulating Rebecca on treading a very difficult line to just about allow it to be possible--and then it didn't happen. I was so sure of my prediction that I had a hard time believing the evidence on the page, and then when I'd absorbed the fact, it threw what I'd seen as delicate treading into a whole other light (of the "No, actually it's quite simple: the obvious judgment is the correct one" variety). The way the story played out in reality makes for more satisfying storytelling, I think, and allows for more nuance and growth for one character, so I was pleased with it. It just took a moment of mental rearranging for me to get there (and I was retroactively a little ashamed of my prediction).

My morning morsel of Robin Wall Kimmerer's Braiding Sweetgrass brought a reflection on strawberries:
In a way, I was raised by strawberries, fields of them. Not to exclude the maples, hemlocks, white pines, goldenrod, asters, violets, and mosses of upstate New York, but it was the wild strawberries, beneath dewy leaves on an almost-summer morning, who gave me my sense of the world, my place in it.

I grew up in upstate New York too. For me it was the black raspberries of early July. Being with them was my everything.

Robin Wall Kimmerer went on to talk about how the nature of a thing can change depending on how it comes to us:
It's funny how the nature of an object--let's say a strawberry or a pair of socks--is so changed by the way it has come into your hands, as a gift or as a commodity. The pair of wool socks that I buy at the store ... I might feel grateful for the sheep that made the wool and the worker who ran the knitting machine ... But I have no inherent obligation to those socks as a commodity, as private property ... But what if those very same socks ... were knitted by my grandmother and given to me as a gift? That changes everything. A gift creates ongoing relationship. I will write a thank-you note. I will take good care of them and if I am a very gracious grandchild I'll wear them when she visits even if I don't like them. When it's her birthday, I will surely make her a gift in return ... Wild strawberries fit the definition of gift, but grocery store berries do not.

Continuing to work my way through Why Didn't You Just Leave, edited by Julia Rios and Nadia Bulkin. As usual with an anthology, some stories strike my fancy more than others.
asakiyume: (Em reading)
I have so many saved up for this! And I'm actually writing on a Wednesday. Wohoo, win condition!

What I've just finished

A Family of Dreamers, by Samantha Nock. [personal profile] radiantfracture put me onto this collection by quoting one of the poems. Samantha Nock is an indigenous poet, and her poems reflect that heritage, but also explore family relations, love, self doubt--you know: the stuff we write poetry about.

Some quotes )

* * *

Ideias Para Adiar O Fim Do Mundo, by Ailton Krenak
This has also been translated into English (Ideas for Postponing the End of the World). Ailton Krenak is an indigenous activist from Brazil, of the Krenak people, and this very short book collects talks that he's given, including the title one. He's very, very good at reminding his listeners that there's more than one way of understanding things, more than one way of approaching problems, and that for some people, the end of the world has been happening for a long, long time. (My Goodreads review has quotes that give a feel for it)

* * *

Besty and Tacy Go over the Big Hill, by Maud Hart Lovelace
They do, and they discover a community of Syrian refugees. The more things change...

This story mulls over kings and queens in lots of different ways. Early on the girls write a letter to Alfonso XIII, who upon turning sixteen has become king of Spain. The girls tell him that they'd love to marry him but realize that, sadly, they can't, since they're not of royal blood (also they're only ten, but they don't mention that), but that nevertheless they wish him the best. And then at the end of the story they get a letter back from the royal secretary, telling them the king appreciates their thoughts! And I was thinking how much smaller the world was then--that girls could write a letter to the royal palace in Madrid, and that a palace secretary would actually answer! ... Well, assuming that that incident is based on something that actually happened in MHL's life--it might not be. But it's conceivably possible. Alfonso XIII came into his majority in 1902. Wikipedia tells me that in 1900, the human population was a much more intimate 1.6 billion. Not like our current 8 billion. Palace secretaries could write to little girls in Minnesota!

What I'm reading now

Braiding Sweetgrass, by Robin Wall Kimmerer. My approach to this has been very roundabout. I'm not a big fan of long books of serious essays, even when I should like them. So I started by just dipping in. But it's won me over, so I'm going to read it straight through.

* * *

Why Didn't You Just Leave, edited by Julia Rios and Nadia Bulkin. A collection of horror stories that answer the question of why people don't just leave the haunted place they're in. Excellent so far.

* * *

Lady Eve's Last Con, by Rebecca Fraimow. A rom-con romcom in SPACE that I've only just started but is highly delightful already, with lines like this:

Ever since we got in on the luxury-liner gambit, money had been dropping into our hands like coolant from a leaky ceiling

and

It wasn't so hard to get someone like Esteban to think that you were their romantic ideal; all you had to do was present an attractive outline and leave plenty of space, and they'd fill in the rest all by themselves.

I think I can see what the end state is going to be, but I am here for the ride!

Coming Soon
Betsy and Tacy Go Downtown, the next of the Betsy-Tacy books.
asakiyume: (yaksa)
In the Empire, both in its home territories, centered on the Eternal City, and in its far-flung colonies, such as Aquacolonia, the port city across wide Oceanus on the continent to the west, some animals are Knowledgeable—meaning they can speak as humans do—and some are not.

Quintus Shu’al is a Knowledgeable fox. In fact, he is the only Knowledgeable fox. Knowledgeable animals are made, not born, and Quintus was awakened on the Silver Roads, special routes like ley lines that allow for non-Euclidean travel and which he has a unique gift for navigating.

Quintus wants nothing more than to know his origin story. The high priest of the God of the Hinge, Scipio Aemilanus, purports to have answers that he’ll supply if Quintus does his bidding. So far Quintus has, and the result was the loss of an entire expedition that Quintus had been leading along the Silver Roads to the gates of Hell. And now Scipio Aemilanus has managed to manipulate Quintus into leading a second expedition to Hell. Only this time Scipio Aemilanus is coming along. So too is the grief-stricken and angry Octavia Delfina, whose sister Cynthia was the head of the last expedition. And so is Walks Along Woman, a bison ambassador from the Great Northern Membership, a polity on this continent.

That’s the set-up for The Navigating Fox--it’s a *lot* of information, and although it takes several chapters to get there, it’s not slow and relaxed; it’s fast and full. That could be a detraction, but for me it had a rich-strangeness that was absorbing (Zootopia-like explanations for how things are set up to accommodate Knowledgeable animals of different sizes, for example), so it was a feature, not a bug.

From here on, a double story unfolds: the story of the first journey—the one where all the explorers were lost—and the second one. By the time Quintus reaches Hell for the second time, the truth about what happened to the first expedition has been revealed and people’s hidden motives have been made clear.

But the real interest, for me, was not in those plot happenings, but in the conversations people have on the journeys, how Quintus’s (and others’) expectations and views of reality are contradicted, or maybe it would be better to say, exposed and viewed from completely other angles.

Here’s one about time, from the first journey:
“How are things going down there?” Cynthia asked him.

“I do not know,” he said.

“Which side is winning?” I asked him.

“I do not know that, either, for sure,” he said. “Probably not yours, though.”

“I don’t have a side,” I said.


Blue shot a curious look at Cynthia Benedictus. “How long have you known this fox?” he asked.

“I can’t say I know him at all,” she said. “I hired him about two months ago.”

“I like that word,” Blue said. “Month. I like counting time like you do.”

I think my favorites, though, were the ones about the nature of Knowledgeable animals. I love, love, love that the story raised this question, turned it around it its hands, held it up to the sun and saw how it caught the light:a number of quotes! they are all so good... )

I think you can enjoy The Navigating Fox for many things, but I do think if you go in expecting something definitive about Hell or even about Quintus’s origins, you will end up disoriented. I think that’s part of the point. Scipio tells Quintus at one point that Quintus has been asking the wrong question. I think this story is about the possibility of other questions. The story is making other observations.

One final, beautiful quote, from when the party’s raccoon cartographers have made a portrait of a voiceless bison named Fondness:
“What do you have there, mapmakers?” asked Walks Along Woman.

Loci held up the sheet. It was a likeness of Fondness. It was one of the most beautiful drawings I had ever seen.

“She does not interpret images the way you do,” Walks Along Woman said gently.

“We know this,” the twins said, speaking atop one another. Their manner was an echo of the gnomic pronouncements of the Membership.

“Then why did you show it to her?” I asked, genuinely curious.

“Because we do not convey images the way you do,” said Loci.
Or Foci. Their scents were obscured by the mass of creatures around us.

asakiyume: (Em reading)
I'm nearly done with Betsy-Tacy and Tib, which continues to be delightful. It's not just that the things the girls get up to are both very believable and amusing, but also the way it's told, the way Maud Hart Lovelace lets in the parents' perspective or the baby siblings', and how events flow one into the next kind of like a picaresque novel, but they're not traveling; they're just living their lives.

They want to cut off locks of hair to give to each other as keepsakes in case one of them dies--which nearly happens! Tacy gets diphtheria! But they end up cutting huge hanks of hair off, not single locks, which means they end up needing haircuts. And then they make a club focused on being good, but they're so intrigued by the penance they invent for if they do bad things that it doesn't work out as planned. I read sections of that out to Wakanomori, it was so funny.

And there was a description of Tib that stuck with me:
Tib was tiny but she was never scared.
"Come on," she said. "There's nothing to be afraid of." And she flew ahead like a little yellow feather.

That: like a little yellow feather.

And then I read another short story in the next issue of my gift subscription to the Sun, "Longshanks" by Samuel Jensen.

below the cut are spoilers for this story )

It's all very litfic. But it *was* well written, and for all my criticisms, I enjoyed reading it.
asakiyume: (Em reading)
I read a novella and a short story recently, and I've been thinking about them and about stories and how we tell them, what we tell, etc. The novella was Iona Datt Sharma's Division Bells; super highly recommended. Love develops between two bureaucrats who are working for a minister in the UK's House of Lords. They're working on legislation, and the minutiae of that and of trying to work for good things in real life, within flawed systems, weaves together perfectly with their personal stories. It's sharply funny but also powerfully moving; it had me in tears a couple of times. But it's never lugubrious or self indulgent--it's never milking the moment. And the humor always comes in when you need it.

Most amazing of all for me, the story had what in my family we always called the Hollywood Betrayal, but what in romance fiction I've come to realize is called the dark moment, that was the complete opposite of what that plot twist usually is for me. Usually, for me, dark moments are an awful experience on a spectrum from frustrating to infuriating, a waste of time, manufactured tension to delay the inevitable. I really dislike dark moments.

But in this story, the dark moment was the culmination of one character achieving true growth, and it led the other character to see how shut down he's become through exhaustion and grief. It was remarkable. It made both characters better, it was dramatic, and it moved the story along in a believable and necessary way.

Truly floored me.

The other thing I read was "Falling Action in Hoboken," a short story by Lucy Tan in the Sun, which a friend got me a subscription to this Christmas. I wanted an excuse to try literary short stories someplace that wasn't the New Yorker, so the subscription is great. And the story was good: it wasn't as world-weary and unpleasant as some of the New Yorker stories I've tried have been. The writing was good, the characters interesting... It's what critics like to call "finely observed."

However (however however however): it was set in New York. *sigh* Okay. Fine. The viewpoint character is something of a cynic, relationship phobic, sure she's going to live alone all her life and basically fine with that. She picks up a guy she and a friend have been mocking at a distance, the sort of guy who reads Rumi at a bar. They think he's a poseur, but it turns out he's genuine. His family has a farm in Michigan. [This set-up seems a little trite. Wholesome farm boy? Really?] So they get involved for-real for-real, and then stuff happens. Every step of the way feels predictable in its generalities without being predictable in the specifics. It ends in a manner that's true to the story.

And I thought to myself, this is an all-right, not-bad story. I read it with interest; I admired the writing.

It's so distanced, though. Is that part of what makes something feel lit-fic-y instead of genre-y? Is lit-fic these days relationship phobic? Is it afraid of being mistaken as a poseur who wants to be seen reading Rumi in a bar?

In the story, the narrator thinks,
I don't trust Matt's easy, expectant attitude. To live like he does is begging for disaster. It's disconnected from reality. But there is also a part of me that wants to see what he sees, that believes a life with him could make me, if not wholesome, then some other kind of whole.

I feel like that fear and wish applies to a lot of lit fic. It craves grandeur but mistrusts it.

LOL, but what do I really know?! Not much!
asakiyume: (Em reading)
Probably most people who read my journal also read [personal profile] sartorias, but for those who don't, or who missed it, Antiphony, the culmination of her stories set on Sartorias-deles, is out now.

This is a wonderful one, full of people finding each other, healing and growing, and getting themselves in a good place for the next great adventure, whatever that might be. It's an absorbing delight to read. You see Carl (a woman; her actual name is Mersedes Carinna), a nervous, conscientious shadow cast by a domineering mother, gradually grow into a confident person who turns an obsessive crush into ... something else. Jilo, now king of the Chwahir, also continues to grow in confidence, and it's wonderful to see Chwahirsland transforming, unfolding and blooming. Lyren, the headstrong, self-centered daughter of Liere, grows a LOT, and finds a place, a purpose, and a partner. Several of Detlev's boys also pair off, and others we see happily engaged in worthy work. Imry's storyline resolves nicely. And I can say all this and it isn't even spoilers, because the fun of the book is in how all this happens.

Probably it would be hard to pick up this book if you aren't somewhat invested in at least some of the characters--though I do believe you could read Carl's story (and then by extension, develop an interest in seeing what will happen with Lyren) even with no prior knowledge. I most certainly recommend Antiphony wholeheartedly for those of you with familiarity with the modern era of Sartorias-deles (the era of Senrid, Clair, Liere, Siamis, etc.). You can purchase it at all the usual places, and also through Book View Cafe.

asakiyume: (miroku)
These thoughts will make most sense if you've already read Ann Leckie's Translation State. They may be comprehensible even if you haven't--but you have to not mind spoilers. With that warning...

What's going on with the Presger Translators? )
asakiyume: (squirrel eye star)
I'd hoped to finish this today, but I probably won't. But look for it soon! I have so many THOUGHTS.

I really love Ann Leckie's books; I've enjoyed all of them, and I gobbled this one right up and did enjoy it ... but not as much as the others. I was more quizzical about narrative decisions, etc. (I have a review here on Goodreads.)

The essay's not going to be about the book overall, though: it's going to be about the Presger Translators.
asakiyume: (Em reading)
I've been slowly reading through Shaun Tan's Tale from the Inner City, short stories and poems that accompany beautiful paintings of animals surreally present in a nameless city. I'd put it on my to-read list years ago, but was actually moved to read it when a Japanese guy on my Twitter reading list wrote an essay about one of the stories.

The essay (which I haven't finished yet) is about the cat story. Both the cat story and the dog story-poem are lovely; they say touching things about dogs and cats in people's lives, and the two pieces complement each other. (The **art** for the dog story is breathtaking: painting after painting of dog-and-person through history. When I got the book from the library, I just sat in the car, poring over those paintings.)

But the other pieces that I've read so far, while they have some great insights and beautiful turns of phrase, on balance have a kind of negativity about the city as a place and about human-animal interactions that's depressing. Animals are presented as numinous, beautiful, ineffable beings that are destroyed by interaction with humans/the city. (The dog and cat stories stand out because that's NOT the case in them.)

I've just finished the story that accompanies the cover painting:



It's truly a gorgeous painting, yes?

In the story, a bunch of siblings climb to the roofs of sky scrapers to fish in the sky, and miraculously, the most dreamy of them catches a moon fish.

The details of fishing in the sky are wonderful--knocking down aerials, holding on to a chimney pipe, things like that--and the details of the anatomy of a fish that lives so high in the atmosphere are marvelous--ozone bladders, aerogel blood, swim bladder. But the story really zeros in on the fact that catching this beautiful creature means its death, and the profit the siblings' parents had hoped to glean from the children's catch slips away from them because the fragile flesh of such a fish decays so fast. So you're (or I, anyway) left with this sense of grief over the destruction of this beautiful creature, and yes, that's certainly a story you can tell about fishing or hunting, but I don't know... I wanted something different to go with that image. (The story does have a hopeful note in the end, but ehhnn)

And then there are the opening lines of the story: "Consider this: There's no ocean in our city. No lake, and no river. Well, no real river, more like a chemical drain that runs upside down with all the muck on top..." That's very typical of how the city is portrayed in the pieces: awful, alienating, miserable. And while that's an experience of "city," it's definitely not the only one. I think I was imagining the stories would be more neutral toward their setting, or even positive. Or at least a mix.

I'll see how the rest of the stories and poems go, but I'm not super sangine. The next one is really short, a poem: a rhino on the freeway is shot, and at first drivers are happy because this obstacle is gone, and then they're sad because it was the last rhino. -_-

But the dog and cat stories are really beautiful. They might be enough to redeem the rest of the book. And the paintings are marvelous.
asakiyume: (Em reading)
Putting off the Amazon posts because it's Wednesday and I actually have two books to report on, which I read in airports. They're both novellas, Malka Older's The Mimicking of Known Successes and Nghi Vo's The Empress of Salt and Fortune. The former is newly out this month; the latter has been out for quite a while but I only just now got to it.

I'm a fan of Malka Older's: her stories are full of interesting ideas that the characters talk about in interesting ways. This one was billed as "cozy Holmesian murder mystery and sapphic romance, set on Jupiter," none of which I object to in the least, but that wasn't where my interest lay: it was in the worldbuilding and the underlying assumptions (as I perceived them) that I was both intensely interested in and felt intensely argumentative about.

more about The Mimicking of Known Successes; no spoilers )

Nghi Vo's The Empress of Salt and Fortune I just loved. Wonderful story, told in a series of conversations between the old servant of a former (now dead) empress and an itinerant cleric. The former empress was a northern outsider brought into the imperial court of Anh to give the emperor an heir; she's marginalized and sent into exile, but slowly slowly turns the tables. The finely observed details in this story!

a handful of gorgeous quotes )

So who has read either of these, and what things did you love/argue with/dislike?
asakiyume: (misty trees)
24 more minutes of Wednesday, so this squeaks in ;-)

I really loved Aster Glenn Gray's World War II retelling of Gawain and the Green Knight. [personal profile] rachelmanija has a great review of it here, which I agree with 100 percent.

So rather than write a review, what I want to do here is call attention to some of the lines and phrases, that, for me, exemplify the wonderful voice AGG uses to tell the tale. It's beautiful language that's not *drenching* (sometimes beautiful language can be like a thunderstorm and leave your clothes heavy and wringing wet). Instead it's beautiful but light: think droplets on a spiderweb. And it's also strong: it does what it sets out to do, effectively.

Squadron leader Art, at the local where all the boys are drinking:
Like a clockwork figure he lifted [his pint] to his lips from time to time, but he did not drink, only sat with his face white and drawn.

The Green Man and Gawain are facing off:
The airmen bunched tighter around Gawain, their anger like a fog ...

There was a wrathful silence

After the Green Man has recovered from what should have been a fatal shot, the squad have to make space in their minds for what has just happened:
They had all seen the green man’s magic, and knew that it was true; yet they had not been raised to believe such things, and it went hard with them.

And then this longer passage which I loved for the graceful, economical way it deals with doing a good thing with an ulterior motive. Of course it would be Perceval who points out the problem with that:
As Gawain left the village he kept an eye out for a dog that might need a thorn removed from its paw, or a hare caught in a trap. But he saw nothing of the kind, and Percy surely would have pointed out that kindness done from conscious motive probably would not help him, anyway.

Here, lovely animals, and lovely interaction of Lord Bertilak with his horse:
The man spoke softly to the beast, with a tenderness in his voice that the horse answered in soft whickers. Gawain smiled, and tried not to drowse in the warmth that rose from the six cows, who regarded Gawain with thoughtful long-lashed eyes.

AGG's Lord and Lady Bertilak are wonderful characters, grand of stature and grand in their affection for each other and for Gawain, whom they call their little pilot--but the story must still play out. There's a library of mystery stories in the Bertilaks' tower, and Lord Bertilak and Gawain talk about them--about what constitutes justice for wrongdoing. “And justice has to be punishment?” Gawain asks. As well he might.

If you like the story of Gawain and the Green Knight, tales of the Round Table generally, or the lingering remains of the fairy realm in the modern world, you will love this retelling.
asakiyume: (feathers on the line)
This is an imaginative and ambitious book.

What I loved most was its worldbuilding, so rich and overbrimming. It takes place in a high-tech, Pacific-centered, post-apocalyptic future. It’s a future in which people are given prosthetic irises at birth to compensate for damage omnipresent radiation would do to their eyes, and in which the Pacific islands that are protagonist Tia’s ancestral homeland now lie 10 meters underwater. Even tiny wordbuilding details are delightful, like lakescreens, films of water that serve both as communications screens (for visuals across long distances, or to display data) and as doors, or like the main Earth spaceship type—the puffer fish.

The indigenous, oceangoing peoples of the Pacific are a big part of this future, and I love that. In an interview, Cole says she wanted to portray a future in which indigenous peoples exist and are thriving, and she definitely succeeds. At the start of the story, Tia is training to work for the Global Indigenous Alliance:
She had a job to do, mapping Pacific Ocean currents for the gravity web – Kermadec Trench, Tonga Trench, Lau Basin. She had learnt to sail with the ocean rhythms, to steer the cross currents. She’d learned these skills from her grandmother, her bubu. She had trained all her life to map the ocean.

I say the book is ambitious because it tries to cover a lot. It wants to highlight Pasifika lifeways and outlooks, and does, both in how deep-space phenomena and travel are understood and also in some wonderful scenes on Earth, like when Tia is sailing a drua, a traditional double-hulled sailing ship, with her uncles. I loved how traditional and modern were blended in the creation of the drua’s sails:
Dua hauled a rickety old 3D printer into the lounge and inputted a design for multiple large exo-patch squares. The printer spat out reams of plaited exo-patches resembling pandanus matting in colour and texture, but stronger and interwoven with multiple solar power conduits. Tia sat in the long grass next to the uncles and helped sew the patches together into a triangular sail with a large hook needle.

But there’s also the through-line plot: events take Tia away from the currents of the Pacific and into deep space on a mission to rescue her older sister, Leilani, who has been lost in a space whirlpool. Once Tia is out in space, she becomes aware of dangerous, bigger stakes. spoiler )

And meanwhile there’s also a painful family story going on: Tia and Leilani’s mother Dani left them behind with their grandmother when they were small so she could pursue a career in the stars. Dani’s lack of involvement with Tia and Leilani is a source of pain and resentment for Tia, who firmly rebuffs her mother’s few, half-hearted attempts to reach out.

That’s not all: there’s also a love story involving an AI (referred to in this story as a ghostborg—great term—or an embod), which goes into a fair amount of depth regarding that AI’s history.

It’s a lot to weave together, and for me in some places it lurched a bit. That’s more or less forgivable, though, because the parts that you lurch to are so interesting. More bothersome for me was Tia’s relationship with Dani. We pretty much exclusively see Tia resenting and disliking Dani, so it was a bit hard for me when Tia would waver and seem to want validation from Dani or disbelieve negative information about Dani—especially seeing as Tia has never lacked for love and support from her grandmother and big sister. But maybe Cole is intending to show the power of the notion of “mother.”

Interestingly, when the ghostborg Turukawa is sharing the story of her creation with Tia, she recounts the tale of how the Fijian snake god Degei nurtured two eggs that his lover Turukawa (for whom the ghostborg is named), a great hawk, had abandoned. The hatchlings became the forebears of the Fijian people. Turukawa says
“[My creator] often pondered how people might have turned out if Degei hadn’t stolen Turukawa’s eggs. Would people have grown into different beings if their real mother Turukawa the hawk had raised them?”

This seems like a fruitful and thought-provoking way to think about Tia and Leilani’s situation, and I would have loved to have seen that parallel expanded on somehow.

I want to end, though, by returning to the imaginativeness of the worldbuilding, landscapes, and characters. If you think of stories as places where you spend time, Na Viro is a great place to spend some time. I will definitely read more from Gina Cole.

asakiyume: (Em reading)
In Aventura en el Amazonas both Mayam and Nashi are learning about the chain of life--Mayam when her mother talks to her about piranhas and other carnivorous fish, and Nashi when he sees a cayman gobble up a roseate spoonbill.

"Some fish feed on others," their mother tells Mayam, who is feeling like it would be good to get rid of some of the more marauding of the the carnivorous fish. "It's like a staircase: if you take away one step, all of it comes crashing down."

And

"Nature knows how to do its thing, even if at first we don't understand" says their father to Nashi.

I didn't see a roseate spoonbill, but I did see a harpy eagle, with its fierce, strange face. (The one I saw looked like the one on the right--photo from the Miami zoo's Harpy Eagle Project)



And I didn't fish for piranhas, but I had some kind of carnivorous fish one meal--and I saw a truly gigantic fish in the market. (It's a bit daunting--it's behind a cut)

big fish )


Yesterday I took Little Springtime and her fiancée to see my father, and during the drive, I passed a truck with a message on the back of its trailer: "Don't like trucks? Buy less stuff!"

Very strange! The driver feels upset about other drivers, presumably car drivers, not "liking" trucks? But the driver is in a great huge 18-wheeler--why should they fuss about the opinions of car drivers? How can it possibly affect them? (Where are they hearing all this negativity?) I'm pretty neutral on trucks, but my impression is that people who feel negatively about them are mainly expressing nervousness about driving near them--or are complaining about bad driving on the part of the trucks--not, y'know, saying trucks are evil or that trucks should disappear, which is kind of what the driver's message seemed to imply.

"Buy less stuff" is disingenuous when all sorts of necessities travel by truck, but okay, let's say people could truly buy less stuff ... then the driver of the truck might lose their job? So on that level too the message was a head scratcher.
asakiyume: (feathers on the line)
Some more quotes from Aventura en el Amazonas:

En verano llueve todos los días, en invierno llueve todo el día (In summer it rains every day, in winter it rains all day long)

... Or, why I need to go back at the peak of the rainy season and see if I still love it.

And this, from a section where the parents are talking to the children about the children's names (and also about their own names):

Tu nombre es como una cancíon que no acaba, el aqua limpia que corre desde la montaña sembrando vida (Your name is like a song that never ends, pure water that flows from the mountain, sowing life)

What a lovely thing to say to a kid. That's what they say about the daughter Mayam's name. The son, Nashi, is named after a traveler from Somalia, who ended up loving the mother's people so much that he settled with them and married her grandmother.

Por ello te escogí su nombre, Nashi, para recordar a ese hombre venido de muy lejos (Thus I chose for you his name, Nashi, to remember that man who came from far away)

The father's name, Antonio, seems very ordinary, but the father says:

Me lo escogió mi padre en recuerdo de un escritor francés que era aviador y escribió muchos libros hermosos, llenos de poesía de la vida (My father chose it for me in memory of a French writer who was an aviator and wrote many beautiful books, full of the poetry of life)

And so we know the father was named after Antoine de Saint Exupéry, which I found somehow really touching.
asakiyume: (shaft of light)
Among the books I brought back with me from Letícia was a copy of a children's novel that I found in the common room of our hotel, Aventura en el Amazonas. I started reading it, and it was so charming (and informative!) that I bought a copy when we got back to Bogotá (no bookstores in Letícia). Its dual narrators are six-year-old twins with an indigenous mother and a white father. At one point they climb out the window of their stilt house rather than go through the door, and since I **saw** kids doing exactly that, I immediately fell in love.

Pretty quote:

Seguí mirando ese mundo de cien verdes distintos en medio de la lluvia ... ¡qué hermosa es esta ventana de selva con cortina de lluvia!

I continued looking at that world of a hundred different greens in the middle of the rain ... how beautiful, this window of jungle with its curtain of rain!


The other is the dissertation of a scholar we met at the Instituto Amazonico de Investigaciones Cientificas SINCHI, a supercool research institute. ("Sinchi" is a Quecha word meaning someone knowledgeable in plants.) She studies "terra preta"--the famous "black earth," created by indigenous people in ancient times. Her research seems really holistic, looking at microbes in soil and their interactions with plants, especially cassava/manioc/yuca--the staple in Amazonas--and she works with indigenous communities, and I'm just so excited to read her work.

... We had wanted to investigate the institute, but what actually prompted us to, on the day we did, was being caught in a rainstorm. We took shelter there, asked if it was all right to look around, and Dr Peña-Venegas kindly took time out of her day to talk to us about the institute and her work!

Profile

asakiyume: created by the ninja girl (Default)
asakiyume

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123 4567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 7th, 2025 10:58 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »