clades!!

Oct. 31st, 2023 12:11 pm
asakiyume: (turnip lantern)
In Ann Leckie's Translation State, Presger Translator society thinks of itself in terms of clades--like lineages among plain old non-Presger Translator humans, but clade also has an everyday, this-world meaning, which is a taxonomical group that shares a common ancestor.

Humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans, and gibbons are in the hominoid clade. They share with Old- and New-World monkeys the clade of anthropoids. Anthropoids and prosimians (a group that includes lemurs and tarsiers) comprise the primate clade. Primates are part of the clade euarchontoglires, along with rodents and rabbits, and then comes the clade eurtheria, which are placental mammals... and eventually if you keep going, we all--and now I'm including plants, slime molds, and fungi--are in the clade eukaryota, and you have to go even further back to get a connection with bacteria and archaea.

Still, we're all family. Do you feel heartwarmed? I feel heartwarmed.
asakiyume: (miroku)
These thoughts will make most sense if you've already read Ann Leckie's Translation State. They may be comprehensible even if you haven't--but you have to not mind spoilers. With that warning...

What's going on with the Presger Translators? )
asakiyume: (squirrel eye star)
I'd hoped to finish this today, but I probably won't. But look for it soon! I have so many THOUGHTS.

I really love Ann Leckie's books; I've enjoyed all of them, and I gobbled this one right up and did enjoy it ... but not as much as the others. I was more quizzical about narrative decisions, etc. (I have a review here on Goodreads.)

The essay's not going to be about the book overall, though: it's going to be about the Presger Translators.
asakiyume: (Em reading)
I've started reading Sofia Samatar's The Winged Histories, and it's got the same finely realized scene setting that I loved in A Stranger in Olondria, but unfortunately the first of the four sections in it focuses on a soldier, and the first part of the soldier's narrative is bloody and depressing in a way that I'm not really in the mood for. But I'm going to push on, because there's more to this section than the war part, and it's only one of four sections in the novel.

Here's what I mean by finely realized scene setting:
The chair was wrote with curious forms of dragons, dogs and rabbits and stranger creatures, goat-headed lions and winged dolphins. It stood alone beneath the trees, a little away from the house, covered with dust and dried leaves. Siski cleaned it off with the hem of her skirt.

--It's that last line: dusting it off with the hem of the skirt. Thinking to mention it, how vivid and present it makes the scene.

I also impulsively purchased the anthology [personal profile] sovay mentioned, Consolations Songs: Optimistic Speculative Fiction for a Time of Pandemic, which features writing by several people on my friends list, and I promised a good friend of mine I'd read N.K. Jemison's The City We Became, which is his new favorite book of all time. Since he also really loved Ann Leckie's books and Adrian Tchaikovsky's Children of Time/Ruin, I feel like chances are good I'll like it. I also have some other things humming in the background that I keep meaning to get to--what's springing to mind as I type is Sue Burke's Interference, sequel to Semiosis, but there are many others.
asakiyume: (squirrel eye star)
I finished The Raven Tower. I really liked it, especially the god-narrator's story arc. I loved him, and I loved his best-friend god, the Myriad, who was initially a meteorite but spends most of her time incarnating in swarms of mosquitoes. There was a Justice-of-Toren moment in the story that was very perfect. Ann Leckie sure does know how to show strong emotion in beings that aren't given to emotions; sometimes a very few words indeed will do. And the god-narrator's reflection on the inevitability of change/death and what makes life meaningful was beautiful. The ninja girl is reading it now, and we're having avid conversations. The healing angel has expressed interest in reading it too, and meanwhile we're reading Hamlet aloud together--you know, taking parts--which is very fun. (The human story arc in The Raven Tower has a Hamlet-esque situation and a few analogue characters, though that's more incidental than plot- or character-central).

Having finished The Raven Tower, I started China Miéville's Embassytown, which I've been meaning to read for quite a while. It is *very* rewarding to get around to reading a book you've been meaning to read for quite a while; it feels like keeping a promise. So far I'm liking this book considerably more than Kraken but not quite as much as Railsea. China Miéville has this gonzo imagination that can be a strength or a liability. I found it beautifully, poetically directed in Railsea, but overexuberant (felt self-indulgent) in Kraken. In this one it's better controlled--it's focused on language and other-ness, which I love, but ... I'm waiting to see if the story will have the heart that Railsea had. I'm not holding my breath, though.

In a way it's a perfect book to read after The Raven Tower, because RT had the premise that a god's utterance was performative/became/must be true, and Embassytown features aliens whose language is so bound up in the speakers' perception of reality that they cannot lie, or barely can lie. The (human) narrator and her husband have this conversation:
“Millions of years back there must have been some adaptive advantage to knowing that what was communicated was true,” Scile said to me, last time we’d hypothesised this history. “Selection for a mind that could only express that.”

“The evolution of trust …” I started to say.

“There’s no need for trust, this way,” he interrupted. Chance, struggle, failure, survival, a Darwinian chaos of instinctive grammar, the drives of a big-brained animal in a hard environment, the selection out of traits, had made a race of pure truth-tellers.

And THAT prompted a cynical thought in me about SF worldbuilding--about how even as SF writers play with the rules of one branch of science, imagining (say) a universe with very different physics, they remain very trammelled and hidebound when it comes to other fields--like (in this case) evolutionary biology. Apparently a gajillion years (or mega hours, as the book would have it, because somehow "hour" is a less subjective time unit than a year [why--oh! There is an actual good reason that I was ignorant of: [personal profile] minoanmiss explains here]) in the future, there is no other-better-different notion for how life all and everywhere comes about than Darwinian evolution.

I mean, I get that if you strange up too many spheres of science simultaneously, you end up with a hard-to-understand mess, but still: I'd like to see a book that broke free from the limitations of evolutionary biology. I suppose you could say Le Guin's Lathe of Heaven did that, with characters able to dream things into existence.
asakiyume: (miroku)
I'm reading Ann Leckie's The Raven Tower right now, and finding it VERY thought provoking if a little slow with regard to actual story-stuff happening. The narrator is a god, and gradually from the narrator we learn what that means. Which is interesting, right? The parameters and limitations of divinity.

One thing that characterizes gods is that what they say MUST be true. It's a requirement. Instead of this fact conferring great power, though, the causality works the other way: a god can only say those things that it has the power to back up.

Gods have to be very careful when speaking about the nature of things. It might be that if you're strong enough, you can perhaps risk saying something like The world is round like a berry and moves around the sun, which is much, much larger than it looks in the sky without knowing beforehand if it's true. Maybe. What if you're wrong? What god is strong enough to endure the loss of the sort of power that even begins to touch what it would take to make that true, to change the very nature of the entire universe? ... So everything we said to each other had to be couched in qualifiers.
--The Raven Tower, 87.

This got me thinking to who/what has the power to create truth in our present day. In some nation-states, the government has that power--as The Simpsons noted:

The editor in me wants to let you know that in proper pinyin romanization that should be Tiananmen

It's possible to say that government-dictated truth is merely something that people pay lip service to. It's not true truth. People can argue that true-truth exists, even if we don't know what it is, even if we never know what it is. I think I agree? I'm never 100 percent sure of anything. But I'm not sure what practical use the knowledge that there's a true-truth out there is to us in a world where we have to make decisions and judgments based on the less-certainly-true truth. That's not to say true-truth isn't valuable or important. There are lots of things are are valuable and important that don't have practical applications ... I'm simply saying that in our everyday lives, it's worth considering who decides the less-certainly-true truth.
asakiyume: (miroku)
I was recently thinking about when a detail is a Chekov's gun and when it's just, y'know, part of scene setting or world building. I was thinking this because my mind was pinging on things that I was sure were being placed in the story to be picked up later (the story was Mr. Penumbra's 24-Hour Bookstore, and the details in question *were* picked up again, but not in the way I expected), and yet not all details are there to be used later. To take an example that pops into my head, in Ann Leckie's Imperial Radch series, it's culturally significant that people in the Radch cover their hands and think uncovered hands are rude/indecent, and that fact is used to show differences in people's attitudes and statuses, but the fact of gloves and wearing them or not never gets used in a plot-defining moment. I don't know; maybe that's too general a plot detail to be a potential Chekov's gun. But even an actual gun on the wall might not be a Chekov's gun, it seems to me. It could be there just to establish the atmosphere of a hunting lodge, say. Or maybe it's a treasured memento of a grandfather who was a great hunter, and the storyteller is using it as a way to show how the protagonist feels about the grandfather, etc. etc.

Do you think you like it better if the Chekov's guns are unobtrusive and only reveal their Chekov-gunniness when they're picked up, or do you prefer to have an aura of menace around them from the start, so you wonder how and when they'll be picked up? Or does it depend? I was about to say that I think it shows more craft if you can't distinguish the Chekov's guns from the general scene setting until the moment comes, but now I'm not so sure.
asakiyume: (squirrel eye star)
I loved it! Here's a non-spoilery review (duplicates what I've put up at Goodreads)

The book's called Provenance, and it's a perfect title, because where things--or people--come from and what (who) they really are is a central theme. The main character, Ingray, is the daughter of a powerful politician from the Hwae system--only actually she's a child from a public crèche, and that sense of her own insignificant roots weighs heavily on her and affects her actions. Hwae society is very wrapped up in what they call vestiges, a term that indicates everything from historical artifacts to personal mementos and souvenirs (one thing that Ann Leckie is excellent at is strange-ifying things--like museums or the importance of artifacts--to reveal stuff about human nature), but what if foundational vestiges are false? The two people Ingray first interacts with are also of mysterious provenance, and their claimed identities change.

In terms of story, there are multiple plots and schemes interacting, from the very personal (Ingray's competition with her brother) to the statewide (Ingray's family is in competition with another family for influence) to the regional planetary (a neighboring federacy wants to manipulate or pressure Hwae into granting it certain concessions that will work to its advantage in the region) to the galactic (the treaty with alien species, which *no* one wants broken, but which is at constant risk).

Ingray is a **very** different protagonist from Breq (from the Imperial Radch trilogy--Ancillary Justice etc.): she's not superhuman in the least, and that makes her bravery extra-impressive ... and very persuasive. When you see her doing things she's terrified of doing but that she feels she has to do to for the sake of people she cares about, it's inspiring! Makes you believe maybe you could too. Not that that's what the book's aiming for, but it's a great side benefit.

And there's humor threaded through the book, whether it's the fact that "compassionate removal" is the Hwaen euphemism for prison or the fact that the Radchaai ambassador to the Presger just can't keep pronouns straight. There are also some uproarious examples of insufficient machine translation.

And some really marvelous aliens. Folks, you will love the Geck ambassador. She's just wonderful.

I'll mention a couple of things I was less enthusiastic about just to acknowledge that they were present: there was a budding romance for Ingray that felt unnecessary and a bit shoehorned in: the object of affection was an interesting person who did bring out the best in Ingray at some key moments, and I could see how *in time* affection/romance might bloom, but Ingray's attention--rightly--was completely elsewhere most of the time, so.

There's also a lot of explaining that goes on. I didn't mind this exactly--I think it's good to make stuff clear to your readers--But sometimes I felt that the level and wide-rangingness of the discussion wasn't credible for a situation. In the end, though, I decided to accept it as an artistic choice, like accepting in a detective story when the detective gathers all the suspects in a room at the end to go over what happened. It was a conscious decision, though.

But let me get back to my main point. This is an excellent, immersive, surprising, fun, thought-provoking, and moving book. Highly recommended.
asakiyume: (squirrel eye star)






Sphene and Translator Zeiat had spent the last two days in the decade room, playing a game of counters. Or at least it had begun as a standard game of counters. By now it also involved fish-shaped cakes, the fragments of two empty eggshells, and a day-old bowl of tea, which they every now and then dropped a glass counter into.




P.S. I imagine the fish-shaped cakes as being taiyaki:

Photo by Armi Deticio, from this website



asakiyume: (squirrel eye star)
I heard something on the radio this morning, a story I don't remember any details about, but it used both the words "contentment" and "complacency," and since then, I've been asking everyone (well, three people):

How do you tell the difference between contentment and complacency?

I'm not asking for the dictionary definitions of them--I know what they both mean--but both from the inside (in other words, if it's yourself and your feelings you're talking about) and from the outside (if you're talking about other people and your perceptions of them), how do you know the difference?

In other news, I made a tumblr for quotes from Sphene in Ancillary Mercy. I haven't yet filled it up with all the quotes, but I've got a good bunch. It's at Ancillary Sphene. I hope to make a picture, too, of Sphene and Translator Zeiat at their game.

In other, other news, if it's nighttime where you are (as it is for me) and not overcast, you can take a look at the moon and all its craters and mountains in high relief, because the sun is shining on it slantwise. I got the idea to look from a two-days-ago broadcast of Strange Universe.

All right then... see you around the Internet.


asakiyume: (squirrel eye star)







I adored the book. My review is here. The one thing I'll add here is this: In Ancillary Sword and Ancillary Mercy, there's some urgency about making sure that the Presger translators understand that organs, viscera, blood, etc., are supposed to be kept *inside* the body--sometimes with humorous effect, sometimes with pathos (and always with a hint of anxiety: this is a basic fact of how humans need to operate that we'd like others to understand about us).

That got me thinking about imagination. Imagination is something that's inside us--like (ideally) blood. But imagination works best (or at least, most generously) if we don't leave it there: if we get it outside us and into the world. We're all translators of our imaginations, struggling to find a language that will make it intelligible to others. When someone manages this, when they share their marvelous interior worlds with us, what a fabulous thing that is. Translator Leckie has done this. Well done, Translator Leckie--your imagination does belong outside your head, shared with the world.


asakiyume: (squirrel eye star)
Note: I don't consider what I talk about spoilers, but if you want a completely virgin experience reading Ancillary Mercy, then save this entry for after you've read it.

I'm really, really loving what [livejournal.com profile] ann_leckie is doing with Ancillary Mercy. I'm about halfway through, and the two things I love most are the abundance of AI characters, with distinctive personalities, and the presence--hurray!--of another Presger translator, Zeiat. And what Ann is doing with both these is exploring personhood, both one's own and others'. At some points this is just terribly terribly moving (more on that when I've finished the book), and at other points hugely humorous, and that's another thing I really love about this book--the humor. The tension has been ramped up to Ancillary Justice levels, but there's laughter too, especially around Zeiat, but also from a surly AI, the ship Sphene.

About personhood. Consider Zeiat's confusion when she encounters Breq after the latter has been badly wounded:

"Fleet Captain," the Presger translator said, coming into the room, Five standing stiff and disapproving at the doorway. "I'm Presger Translator Zeiat." She bowed. And then sighed. "I was just getting used to the last fleet captain. I suppose I'll get used to you." She frowned. "Eventually."

"I'm still Fleet Captain Breq, Translator," I said.

Her frown cleared. "I suppose that's easier to remember. But it's a little odd, isn't it? You're pretty obviously not the same person. Fleet Captain Breq--the previous one, I mean--had two legs. Are you absolutely certain you're Fleet Captain Breq?"

"Quite certain, Translator."

This echoes their first conversation, when Zeiat wasn't sure of her own identity, but was persuaded of it by Breq.

Needless to say, mutual understanding when there are basic doubts such as this can be hard:

Translator Zeiat blinked. Sighed. "Oh, Fleet Captain. It's so very difficult talking to you sometimes. It seems like you understand things and then you say something that makes it obvious that no, you don't understand at all."


There's so much more--SO MUCH MORE--I'd like to share, but later. For now I'll just say that (so far) this is exactly the book I was hoping for--everything I wanted, plus surprises. THANK YOU ANN.


asakiyume: (squirrel eye star)
I've been waiting to read Ancillary Sword until I could do it book-group style with the ninja girl. The chance presented itself at the end of last month, and we both finished it the other day and were discussing it avidly via messages this morning.

The reviews I read said that it was a very different sort of book from the first--quieter--but the reviewers all liked it as much as or better than the original. I enjoyed it tremendously (I carried it with me everywhere so I could read in spare moments), but I didn't like it better. I kept on wanting things that didn't come (for those of you who've read the book, that would be more about Tisarwat's unique situation and more about Translator Dlique, plus something more central that I'll get to in a moment), and I was bemused by much of what did come. The situation on the Athoek was interesting, and Ann Leckie did a great job of showing how different groups have different interests, and showing how personal situations intersect with bigger issues (how the personal is political, heh), but those bigger issues were (to my mind) predictable. I felt a little as if I was looking in on a sociology case study that promised to hit on X, Y, and Z points. It did, and the details of how it did were gripping, but I chafed a little.

Some of that teacherliness was present in Ancillary Justice, too, but I completely forgave it/wasn't bothered by it--why? And why not this time? Part of it is personal idiosyncrasy--I loved small details of life on Ors and life on Nilt and found them so vivid that the instructive elements paled. But much, much more important, I loved getting to know Breq and shared entirely in her personal pain and loss. The driving emotion that propels her through Ancillary Justice was so, so intense.

In Ancillary Sword, Breq has only brief (though very memorable, and very moving) moments of emotion. She's affected by the pain and suffering she sees, but it's not hers in the way that it was in the first book. I missed that. I know it couldn't be repeated ... but all the same, I missed it.

I'm mystified and deeply, deeply curious about what will happen in Ancillary Mercy. Ancillary Sword felt like a book that you might get if there were going to be nine or ten stories about Breq and the other characters--it touched on the larger issues that Ancillary Justice raised, but it doesn't advance them very much. A few new elements come into play. How will the trilogy wrap up? I can't wait to find out!

ETA: Just read the Goodreads book summary for Ancillary Mercy and it sounds like it'll focus on the stuff I want to know more about--yay!


asakiyume: (feathers on the line)
Milky Way Railway
Miyazawa Kenji, who wrote the mysterious and beautiful story Gingatetsudo no yoru (銀河鉄道の夜; translated by Sarah Strong as Night of the Milky Way Railway), lived in Iwate Prefecture, which the ninja girl visited this past New Years. She sent us candies in this commemorative tin:







You can see that after Ginga (Milky Way) station comes Minami Juji (The Southern Cross)

playlists
I've been very much enjoying the six Ancillary Justice playlists [livejournal.com profile] ann_leckie posted about in a recent LJ entry. They're all fan made and quite various in feel. They're at 8tracks.com.



windships

In this entry, [livejournal.com profile] blairmacg interviews Brad Beaulieu about the worldbuilding in his novel The Winds of Khalakovo, one of the novels in the StoryBundle I mentioned a couple of entries back. One of the things his world includes is windships. It got me thinking of how appealing the idea of windships is, the idea of sailing in the sky. Terri-Lynne DeFino had windships in Beyond the Gate that were quite magnificent.

The windships in Beyond the Gate are kept aloft by the magic of the Pilfer, which pulls elements from the surrounding air in and turns them into a levitating mist (though there's more to it than that, as the characters learn).

I haven't yet read The Winds of Khalakovo, but from the interview, it sounds like the mechanism of those windships are equally interesting--and very different.


asakiyume: (squirrel eye star)







It IS ANCILLARY JUSTICE FAN TEA, YO.

Justice tea

Justice tea

I am drinking the Justice Blend. I don't have gloves on, though. If only it were a humid, sweaty day, I could pretend I was on Shis'urna, but in fact it's a cool and delightful day. Who am I?

When you played games set in story worlds, did you mainly pretend to be a character from the story, or did you create an OC and interact with the characters? I think I mainly did the latter, but sometimes the former.

THOSE OF YOU WHO'VE READ ANCILLARY JUSTICE, if you were to play an imaginary game set in the world of Ancillary Justice--not write a fanfic, mind, but play a game--which character would you be, or would you be an OC?

And a question for you, [livejournal.com profile] ann_leckie, if you happen by: which of your characters enjoys Justice blend the most, do you think?
asakiyume: created by the ninja girl (Default)
I received a wonderful present from a dear friend: Radchaai pins, created by Ann Leckie! The long dangly one is for the House of Awer, which, as readers will recall, Lt. Skaaiat came from. Lt. Skaaiat shared with the protagonist a deep affection for another main character whose name I won't mention so as to avoid ALL THE FEELS, but I am *so happy* to have this pin. And, if you look in the upper corner, you will see a pin with an iridescent fish, which calls to mind a song that's central to the book:

My heart is a fish
Hiding in the water-grass
In the green, in the green

Radchaai pins



asakiyume: (squirrel eye star)
As you may know, I really loved Ann Leckie's Ancillary Justice--loved it so much that I wanted to get Ann in a room and talk with her for at least 36 hours about ALL THE THINGS the book made me think about. That's not possible, but Ann *did* let me send her a bunch of interview questions, which she's kindly answered.

On gender )

On distributed consciousness )

On the concept of freedom )

If you had worlds enough and time )

Reader reactions )

Food! )

And there you have it! Any aspects of these questions or responses that you'd like to dig into further? Leave a comment, and maybe when she has a free moment, Ann will swing by and share more thoughts.

ETA: (Okay, spoiler is gone and the comment will go back up (spoiler free) when Carlton is able to access LJ next.)
asakiyume: created by the ninja girl (Default)
snow squall
On the way to my father's there was a snow squall. The trees melted away and the lanes of the highway disappeared.

snow squall

pizza
I am so sorry, but it must be said. Here we have a leaning tower of pizza . . . boxes.

pizza boxes

ice
This puddle has the smoothest ice, the best ice. if you run and slide, you can go almost clear across--no friction.

smoothest ice ever

The ice has creatures. . .

an ameba )

And treasures . . .

an embedded bottle )
asakiyume: (squirrel eye star)
Now I have to breathe deep and recover myself. And sometime in the next few days, write a paean review (yeah . . . review).



asakiyume: (definitely definitely)
It's not really spoilers because it won't mean anything if you haven't read the book, but all the same, maaaaaybe you don't want to click through if you haven't read it. It's just one name, contextless, but still.

it's… )


Profile

asakiyume: created by the ninja girl (Default)
asakiyume

June 2025

S M T W T F S
123 4567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 9th, 2025 09:09 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios
OSZAR »